Before selecting C# as the improvement language for developing Android, iOS and Windows Phone apps an enterprise would make certain as to what its development strategy goes to be.
Are they making plans to broaden cellular business packages for clients and act as companies?
Are they making plans to enable their existing programs on mobile platforms?
Are they planning to assist their current patron increase cell programs for his or her existing business packages that the employer already helps?
What is their cutting-edge generation stack being adopted by way of the organization?
Are they making plans to reuse existing code?
Is it a demand to migrate a subset of the enterprise functionality to the mobile platform?
With respect to the above-noted questions, the five most vital factors to be stored in mind while selecting a.Net language inclusive of C# for cell improvement are listed below.
Reusability: This is the primary factor that comes to mind. Is there any possibility of reusing code written within the beyond or is there an imaginative and prescient to reuse the code written in the present for the future. If the enterprise is natural .Net save and they need so one can reuse their existing enterprise capability without having to fuss approximately rewriting the code using java or objective C then they can virtually reuse the prevailing.Net dlls. These DLL’s will run satisfactorily on the Mono VM and all they want to do is develop the UI for applications the use of mono for android or MonoTouch for iOS. This offers organization with a big incentive specifically in the event that they want to reuse their present business capability. One might always contend that the identification may be completed with the aid of developing native applications that name the enterprise offerings(uncovered via REST-based internet-offerings).
While this approach is also possible and is a widely known technique in many instances most of the design lovers could argue that it is better to have the commercial enterprise common sense execute as close as feasible to the local mobile OS. Hence we’re able to reuse the existing commercial enterprise DLL’s and simply consciousness on creating the UI for local programs. This is a very key location which organizations need to observe particularly if the intention is to reuse the same.Net commercial enterprise common sense throughout multiple mobile systems.
Migration: This is the second one aspect we want to remember at the same time as deciding on the development generation. Many key cell programs are usually a subset of a bigger enterprise utility. This is real in instances of maximum banking cell programs, social n/w applications, professional n/w utility and LOB programs. So in those instances, the cell utility is usually a subset of the functionality of the real application. What it approach is that the cellular software displays will comprise a lesser amount of controls and seize a lesser quantity of data and perform most effective the most essential functions. In such instances migrating a current.Net application to the Android and iOS platform shop loads more effort in getting a cell version of the commercial enterprise utility up and walking into the shop. Migrating an existing software can be greater fruitful and yields wealthy advantages whilst saving a number of time in no longer having to rewrite or re-architect a software in a distinct language which includes Java or goal C in particular when you have the right set of equipment and methodologies in the vicinity to carry out the same.
Portability: The 0.33 key thing we need to keep in mind is whether we would like to create a software that would run on multiple platforms. If we need to multi-goal a couple of systems along with iOS, Android and Windows Phone OS then the use of the Mono platform(with C# as dev language) does seem like a great desire and can acquire large benefits. The Mono for Android and MonoTouch frameworks shall we us the broaden.Net code which can be reused on multiple structures. We can use the identical multi-targeting approach that was used to build common applications that run on each WPF as properly Silverlight engines. We have this benefit while we write a cellular software using Mono framework. We can write code once and actually goal more than one platforms. The maximum distinguishing element of those platforms is their UI structure, with Android apps having.XML documents and iOS platform having its personal MVC architecture. If we architect our code neatly we can easily isolate the enterprise logic and utility segment of the code and maintain them in separate dlls in order to be capable of being used on any of the above stated structures. The respective UI architecture can be generated unexpectedly the use of equipment or a systematic methodology. In this way we’ve got a single cell app with a single codebase this is maintained in a single language (C#) and may be ported to multiple structures.
Adaptability: The fourth component is the adaptability of the development language. With .Net and C# coupled with the Xamarin suite you get a wide type of alternatives. One can write C# code that may be reused on iOS, Android, and Windows Phone gadgets. Also, we’re quite conscious that with ASP.Net MVC coupled with HTML5 and Jquery we are able to effortlessly develop cellular apps with look and experience of local apps and with cell frameworks which include PhoneGap and Jquery cell we are able to without difficulty assemble hybrid packages. Hence the.Net framework and C# language provide a completely excessive diploma of adaptability as a moving platform development language while coupled in conjunction with the Xamarin suite.
Return on Investments – ROI is one very crucial factor that is considered whilst developing cellular utility. Few factors that we need to don’t forget at the same time as calculating ROI
· Project Cost – What is the preliminary price this is required to expand the mobile application?
· Benefits from the mission – Benefits relies upon at the sort of the software. If it is revenue generating an application, blessings could be direct. If it’s a client provider app, blessings will be oblique
· Reach of cell app – If it is an internet software, attain will be higher but if it is a local app, reach might be limited to the users of the targeted cell platform
With Mono framework, you may actually see blessings considering the above points. Project cost can be nicely underneath the bounds as only the Mono licenses we need to keep in mind. We do not want every other particular investment. .Net professional assets are easier to find and are not very costly. With Mono Framework, all of the platforms may be reached in an effort to ensure that extra mobile users may be reached with according to the dollar invested at the task. With a lower venture value and higher attain, even the oblique advantages appear higher and ROI is lots better.
It’s very crucial to keep the above factors in mind whilst deciding on C# coupled with the Xamarin suite to broaden mobile programs.
My name is Wesley George Weel. Currently operating as a Technical Architect for iGATE. The article is based totally on my stories from the research and development work I presently do inside the cell area. As an Architect, I actually have attempted to empathize with what technologist in an agency could look for earlier than adopting a brand new generation.
This factors cited above could be used as a reference for determining whether or not to use.Net as an improved technology for cell apps. Once development method is installed vicinity migration techniques can also be installed region to reap wealthy ROI.